By early afternoon the hordes were already gathering on the
bridge. One diver strutted back and
forth along the parapet, flexing and posing, while another worked the crowd,
taking BAM, Euros and even Kuna from the tourists who had flocked to Mostar on
day trips from the Dalmatian coast. They hadn’t timed it right this time. They'd waited too long and the crowds had become bored, dispersing off into the old town to search for coffee pots and ice
cream, post cards and paintings. Or
perhaps they’d timed it perfectly, returning to the club house on the turret
of the bridge with a wodge of notes.
Two hours later we return to the bridge and the diver is back. This time he jumps, arms
outstretched before pulling himself pencil thin to plunge feet first into the
fast-flowing bright green waters of the River Neretva below. Young men have been diving off the Stari Most for centuries to impress the local girls and during the summer months the divers of the Mostar Diving
Club earn a fair trade from tourists who pay to photograph them making the
iconic 22-metre jump.

Footage of the bridge’s destruction was shown around the
world and for some reason, as the shelling of Dubrovnik’s old town had done during the Croatian War in 1991, stirred feelings of outrage with westerners. The war had been morally unambiguous when Bosnian
Serbs, sponsored by Serbia, launched an offensive against the dream of an independent
multi-ethnic Bosnia, but when fighting broke out between the Bosnian Croats and
Bosniaks, it transformed the conflict into one far more complex, as western
politicians never tired of telling reporters.
How could they possibly be expected to intervene in such a complicated civil war, where all sides were attacking one another?
Mostar served as the frontline between the Bosnian Croat
forces (HVO) and the Bosnian government forces (ARBiH) during the early years
of the war and was the scene of fierce fighting. The fragile alliance between the HVO and
ARBiH in the latter half of the war did nothing but paper thinly over the
fissures in Mostar’s society.

This uneasy coexistence is mirrored across Bosnia. The recent debacle over ID numbers in the
Parliament has only enflamed tensions between the Republika Srpska and
the Bosnian Federation.
Bosnia-Herzegovina qualified for their first World Cup in October – it was
celebrated in Sarajevo; less so in Banja Luka and Mostar. What comes across strongest in eyewitness
accounts of the war is a certainty that the majority of Bosnians were good,
peace-loving people, that they all got along exceptionally well before the war,
and that the fighting was perpetrated by outsiders.[1] Yet a war was fought there and for
many the memories are still raw.

[1]
Svetlana Broz, Good People in an Evil
Time: Portraits of Complicity and Resistance in the Bosnian War (New York : Other Press,
2004).
Excellent article. Though provoking and very informative. What will it take to end this conflict? Have we moved on at all?
ReplyDeleteGood article! Conspiracy theorists seem to believe that governments can hide things but in reality they are pretty incompetent unless you live in a totalitarian regime who control the media. Think Oliver North and the Iran-Contras or just running an economy.
ReplyDeleteJFK was the first young president, much like Tony Blair in 1997(sexed up dossier). The Russians and Chinese reckoned that he was not mentally strong enough at that age to deal with their aged politburo leaders who had come through WW2 as commanders. Hence they had a go with missiles on Cuba. The US military over reached themselves with Bay of Pigs as they also did in trying to get hostages out of Iran during Carter's presidency. JFK also got the US into Vietnam, the expensive but ultimately winning the space race.
History has been kind to JFK's presidential legacy and his personal life aka brushing aside his numerous affairs(Marilyn Monroe). As you write, when the legend becomes fact, print the legend.